| 1. | A randomized , controlled trial was designed to compare high - and low - osmolar contrast media
本组随机对照试验就高渗和低渗两种造影剂进行对比。 |
| 2. | A study on the effect of low osmolar and nonionic contrast on renal function in 24 patients with abnormal renal function
非离子型造影剂对24例肾功能轻度异常患者肾功能的影响 |
| 3. | Furthers study is needed of the role of low - osmolar contrast media in patients with severe renal impairment
有关低渗性造影剂对于有严重肾功能损害病人的影响作用尚须进一步研究。 |
| 4. | Conclusion : low - osmolar contrast media did not offer statistically significant benefits to patients with renal impairment
结论：在肾功能损害的病人中，低渗性造影剂的使用并不能提供有统计意义的好处。 |
| 5. | Low - osmolar contrast material is presumed to be less nephrotoxic , than high - osmolar material though researchers have found conflicting results
尽管研究的结果总是自相矛盾，低渗造影剂被推测与高渗性造影剂相比，其肾毒性可能为低。 |
| 6. | Severe renal failure , defined asa > 50 % increase in serum creatinine , occurred in 3 . 4 % of patients in the high - osmolar group and in 1 . 5 % of the low - osmolar group
在严重肾功能衰竭的患者中， 3 . 4 %的高渗和1 . 5 %的低渗造影剂使用患者的血清肌酐水平上升值超过50 % 。 |
| 7. | Results : inthe randomized study , 6 . 8 % of patients given high - osmolar and 3 . 8 % of those given low - osmolar contrast media had serum creatinine increases of at least 25 %
结果：在（本组）随机对照研究中， 6 . 8 %的高渗和3 . 8 %的低渗造影剂使用者其血清肌酐水平至少增高了25 % 。 |
