It has been too often assumed that " proof " must be what kant called " apodeictic " that is of the kind that we used to be familiar within euclid , where the argument could be concluded with a triumphant q . e . d . because every rational person who understands the propositions is compelled to accept the inference 我们常常假定， “证据”一定是康德所称之“绝对肯定的” ? ?那种我们在欧氏推论中所熟悉的，那种可以把论据推演到成功地“证完” ，因为每个懂得命题的具有理性的人都一定会接受那样的推断。
