It was mostly considered in academic circles that the two chinese translations introduced the old galenical anatomy , and the knowledge of anatonmy introduced in the late ming dynasty was that in medieval europe 以往国内学者一般认为这两部著作是古罗马盖仑体系之下的旧学说，没有反映文艺复兴时期以维萨留斯为代表的新的解剖学成果。
