| 1. | Review on rehearing of procedure of second instance
有关公诉案件二审发回重审程序的几点思考 |
| 2. | Fourthly , the re - judgment is distorted in appeal where some cases that should be re
司法实践中出现应依法改判而发回重审或不应改判而改判的情形。 |
| 3. | The unlimited remanding for a new trial wastes precious judicial resources and influences lawsuit efficiency
无限制的发回重审浪费了宝贵的司法资源，影响了司法的效率。 |
| 4. | Civil new trial system plays in practice procedural safeguards , rights protection and supervisory functions
摘要民事诉讼发回重审制度在实践中发挥着程序保障、权益保护以及监督制约的功能。 |
| 5. | The law not only pursuits justice but also tries to create orders , which just meets the basic needs of people
在实行举证时限制度以后，对事实不清、证据不足的案件发回重审就显得依据不足。 |
| 6. | The third is that remanding for a new trial for the reason of " fact being not clear and evidence being not enough " is not in accordance with e vi -
三是以“事实不清，证据不足”为由改判或发回重审不符合证据规则的要求。 |
| 7. | " for the retrial of a remanded case , the people ' s court of first instance shall form a new collegial panel in accordance with the procedure of first instance .
发回重审的案件，原审人民法院应当按照第一审程序另行组成合议庭。 |
| 8. | Many disadvantages exists in practice by regulating remanding for a new trial for the reason of " fact being not dear and evidence being not enough "
规定二审对原审判决认定事实不清、证据不足可以发回重审，实践中存在很大弊端。 |
| 9. | Dence regulations . . amending judgment or remanding for a new trial for the reason of " fact being not clear and evidence being not enough " pursues objective truth , which is not scientific in civil litigation , not in accordance with evidence regulations
以“事实不清，证据不足”为由改判或发回重审追求的是客观真实，这种追求客观真实的民事案件证明要求显然不科学，不符合证据规则的要求。 |
| 10. | In the law should be strictly defined the standards of ordinary procedure , abolished the new trial system in supervision procedure , demarcated the number of the new trial in same case , and cleared the relationship between new trial and proof deadline
在法律规定中应当严格界定普通程序中发回重审的标准，取消审判监督程序中的发回重审，限定同一案件发回重审的次数，明确发回重审与举证期限的关系。 |
