How to distinguish qi ' s or japanese dao tan 请教一下,如何分开戚家还是日本的刀镡
2.
Take one more look at this tan , it ' s erect - hair dragon grain 再看这镡上的也免强算个竖发龙纹了。
3.
The tip is damaged heavily , and the hole close to tan should have copper lacked 刃尖磨损较重，靠镡处那个孔应该是缺了铜。
4.
It should be a sword in mid qing dynasty . dao tan is not clear . a not bad weapon 应该是一把刀剑，清中期。刀镡看不清，是一件不错的兵器。
5.
The second one is muguatan waist sword , like cavalry pang sword posted on the forum 第二把是木瓜镡的腰刀，有点象坛子里贴过的骑兵旁刀。
6.
This waist dao used for actual combat , but not ignores art , only through the whole , tan looks weakly 实战主义的腰刀，也没有忽视艺术性，只是从整体看，镡倒显得弱了。
7.
I don ' t understand . did the soldiers use dao tan or gold - plating ? did it dilate upon ? this is the royalty level 不懂，兵丁拿的剃刀镡也镏金？会不会太铺张了？这起码也是皇家卫队的级别了。
8.
I think the inscripions of tan in metropolitan museum , depending on the early period , try to test its level that can distinguish 看大都会那把镡的文释在三代里还应是靠早期的，这试一试水平就分出来了。
9.
Pay attention to dragon pearl , there ' s a similar tan , which is considered as the thing in ming songzhen , does it need to verify again 注意龙珠，有过类似的纹饰刀镡，被肯定地认为明崇桢物，是否要从新考量。
10.
This thing comes later , i think it shoule be come forth in the late period of tang , and as the same period of japanese dao tan 这个东西出现比较晚，我个人认为最早出现于晚唐，和日本刀镡出现的时间不相上下。
