| 1. | Chapter 3 analyzes thoroughly the basis for finding the facts
第三章是全面分析案件事实认定的依据。 |
| 2. | The facts confirmation is the fundamental link in the realm of litigation certification
事实认定是诉讼证明领域的基础环节。 |
| 3. | Chapter 2 discusses the most favorable type of court structure to promote the accuracy of fact finding
第二章论述什么类型的法庭结构最有利于提高案件事实认定的准确性。 |
| 4. | Recognition of a specific administrative behaviour and investigation of law ' s application make up the basic content of administrative lawsuib
对具体行政行为的事实认定和法律适用进行审查是行政诉讼的基本内容。 |
| 5. | Most of those judicial explanations enacted by our supreme court involve only the explanation of laws instead of the finding of facts
我国的最高法院颁布的司法解释大都是有关法律解释的内容，涉及案件事实认定问题很少。 |
| 6. | When we compare courts and administrative organs , we find each side has its own advantages as above two aspects are concerned
尽管事实认定是适用法律的前提和基础，但由于法院和行政机关相比，二者分别在法律适用和事实认定上有着优势上的差异。 |
| 7. | There is three factors which influence the determinacy of the fact as adjudicating ground : the text of the law , the affirmation of the fact and the factor of society and individual
在法律运行过程中,裁判事实的确定性问题受三方面因素的影响:法律条文的确定性,事实认定的确定性和社会、个人等其他因素的确定性。 |
| 8. | But such relief is insufficient in our country . the main reason is that appeal , opposition to execution and raising another action can ’ t solve the conflicts in facts recognition and validity of judgments
然而,我国法律对案外第三人的救济存在不足之处,其主要原因在于申诉、执行异议和另行起诉不能解决事实认定与既判力冲突问题。 |
| 9. | As is proved by the global judicial experience , fact - finding , which is far more difficult than law - applying , is the central task of litigation , and the finding of the overall facts could be seen as an important subject for achieving the goal of litigation
世界的司法经验证明，事实认定比适用法律要困难得多，认定案件事实是诉讼的中心任务，整体的事实认定问题可谓为追求诉讼目的重要课题。 |
| 10. | Part iii how to determine the scope of compensation for breach of contract firstly , the author makes a comparison and analysis in classification of damage in breach of contract between the typical common law countries and civil law ones
第二部分违约损害赔偿范围的确定这一部分是本文的主体框架。首先，笔者对英美国家及大陆法系国家关于违约损害的分类进行了比较分析，希望能对我国司法实践中违约损害的事实认定有所启示。 |
